NEWS:
US intelligence has spent considerable resources spying on foes, but also on Israel. (Washington Post)
Israel's Bedouin citizens feel betrayed by a mass relocation plan. (Reuters)
Palestinian officials reject Norwegian comments about cutting aid if there is no progress on peace. (Xinhua)
Egyptian naval vessels shoot at and arrest Palestinian fishermen near the Egypt-Gaza border. (Ma'an)
The US is still set for a limited strike against Syria despite a "no" vote in the British Parliament. (New York Times)
France says airstrikes against Syria could begin as early as Wednesday. (AFP)
Russia beefs up its naval presence off the Syrian coast in advance of potential airstrikes. (Los Angeles Times)
Potential US airstrikes in Syria pose new challenges to the Egyptian government and opposition. (New York Times)
PM Netanyahu says there is "a low probability" Israel will be drawn into conflict with Syria. (Times of Israel)
Sec. Hagel says the US is seeking an international coalition for action on Syria. (Xinhua)
Officials from various Palestinian factions oppose a US strike on Syria. (Jerusalem Post)
Egypt denies an Israeli ship docking permission for repairs. (AP)
Uganda denies cutting a deal with Israel over deported African migrants. (Reuters)
A Muslim Brotherhood member is shot and injured by Egyptian forces in Sinai unrest. (Ma'an)
Eyewitnesses say a bloody August 24 attack in Sinai was conducted by an ambulance car bomb. (Asharq Al-Awsat)
COMMENTARY:
Hussein Ibish asks if Syria is being "Lebanized" or Lebanon being "Syrianized," as Hezbollah draws its country into the Syrian war (Daily Beast/Open Zion)
Michael Gordon says the purpose of US strikes on Syria will be to restore deterrence, not oust Pres. Assad. (New York Times)
Edward Joseph and Elizabeth O’Bagy ask what to do next after the US strike. (Foreign Policy)
Yoel Marcus says the use of chemical weapons and the question of Iran are the turning point for the US in Syria. (Ha'aretz)
Roger Cohen says Assad must be made to pay a price for using chemical weapons. (New York Times)
Ari Shavit says the US has no choice but to act in Syria. (Ha'aretz)
Jeffrey Goldberg thinks a US strike against Syria might actually make things worse. (Bloomberg)
Robin Wright asks what's the next step after US air strikes against Syria. (Los Angeles Times)
Caspian Makan says the world should have acted before Syria turned to chemical weapons. (YNet)
The Jerusalem Post asks if Syrian and Iranian threats of retaliation are just bluster. (Jerusalem Post)
Bradley Burston compares the evil taking place in Syria to Auschwitz. (Ha'aretz)
Hassan Haidar says Pres. Assad is "no longer an acceptable interlocutor." (Al Hayat)
Walid Choucair says the US is hoping airstrikes would lead to Geneva 2, or at least no more use of chemical weapons. (Al Hayat)
The Arab News says Saudi Arabia believes it's time for serious and decisive action against the Syrian regime. (The Arab News)
Arron Merat says the crisis over Syria offers a new opportunity for US-Iranian negotiations. (Al Monitor)
David Brooks says the biggest security threat in the world is growing sectarian tension in the Middle East. (New York Times)
Mara Revkin describes growing radicalization in the Sinai Peninsula. (Washington Post)
Seth Freedman says the Israeli military should praise, not punish, dancing Israeli soldiers. (The Guardian)
Daniel Byman asks if, in spite of its current difficulties, Hamas is actually winning in the long run. (The Washington Quarterly)