Events | Daily News | About Us | Resources | Contact Us | Donate | Site Map | Privacy Policy
The Jerusalem neighborhood of Har Homa, with its white stone buildings and billboards hawking new real estate projects, now has managed to disrupt Israeli-Palestinian peace talks for the second time in a decade.
Israel's announcement this month that it plans to build 307 new homes in this east Jerusalem neighborhood, on land Palestinians want for the capital of their future state, drew international condemnation.
The plan was the first wrench thrown into peace negotiations relaunched last week after a violent seven-year hiatus.
As donors meet in Paris to pledge aid to the Palestinian Authority, BBC Middle East analyst Roger Hardy explains the steps being taken to make sure the money will reach those who need it most.
The idea is simple - to use a massive injection of outside aid to consolidate the fledgling peace process launched in Annapolis in November.
But how will the aid get to those who need it? And how will it be spent?
It was hard to avoid the obvious seasonal message when Tony Blair, briefly playing the tourist, stayed overnight in Bethlehem recently: yes, there was room at the inn in the little West Bank town, a rare public vote of confidence in prospects for the Palestinian economy.
Britain's former prime minister has been travelling incessantly since becoming the representative of the "Quartet" of Middle East peacemakers in the summer, and generally keeping a low profile.
Today's conference in Paris, a drive to breathe life into the Palestinian economy, is as easily derided as last month's summit in Annapolis, but it is worth much more.
Monday's gathering in Paris of donor countries to support the widely hoped-for establishment of a Palestinian state was necessary but not sufficient. Without the funds that were pledged, any form of Palestinian independence that might be negotiated as part of a peace agreement to end the Israeli occupation would be a flimsy thing indeed. The more important litmus tests are yet to come, however, and each demands unprecedented levels of seriousness from both the principals and their American mediators.
When Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni declared in Paris on Sunday that "a developed Palestinian economy is in Israel's interest," we can assume that she meant that it is also in the interest of the Palestinians. After all, it is for the Palestinian, not the Israeli interest that more than 90 representatives of states and organizations gathered in order to express their willingness to contribute to the economic development of Palestine.
There is great public skepticism regarding the outcome of the Annapolis meeting. Many of the skeptics state that at the end of the day, it was little more than a photo-op for the principals - Bush, Olmert and Abbas - and that it produced no real substance.
The failure of the parties to produce a joint statement that contained any content on the principles for resolving the core issues for permanent status, for some, points to the Annapolis meeting as a failure.
There is a children's park not far from my Jerusalem home, which neatly illustrates international aid attempts to deal with the Israel-Palestine question.
The playground, really only known to the Palestinian local population, was paid for by an Italian contribution, funded through the EU and constructed by the UN Development Programme, and, at first glance, all looks in order with its see-saw, slides and climbing frame.
Then you notice the swings.
For years, countless synagogues and other Jewish institutions in the United States have flown the banner declaring "We Support Israel in Her Quest for Peace."
Links:
[1] http://www.americantaskforce.org/print/5854
[2] http://www.americantaskforce.org/printmail/5854
[3] http://www.americantaskforce.org/printpdf/5854
[4] http://www.americantaskforce.org/rss/wpr
[5] http://www.americantaskforce.org/world_press_roundup/20071218t000000
[6] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/18/AR2007121800177_pf.html
[7] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7148175.stm
[8] http://www.guardian.co.uk/middleeast/story/0,,2228779,00.html
[9] http://americantaskforce.org/db/index.php?e=1&s=4&f=1
[10] http://dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=1&article_id=87537&categ_id=17
[11] http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/935523.html
[12] http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1196847364346&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FPrinter
[13] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/12/18/do1803.xml
[14] http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1196847374237&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull