The vote is largely symbolic, the outcome nearly assured: The Palestinians and Israelis are closely watching the evolving positions of a few key countries in Thursday’s U.N. General Assembly resolution to raise the Palestinians’ status from a U.N. observer to a nonmember observer state. The United States and Israel are strongly opposed, saying they fear it will only slow progress toward a peace deal. The measure only requires a majority and is all but certain to pass. The Palestinians have been lobbying Western countries, particularly in Europe, in hopes of presenting a broad international consensus against Israel.
Two-thirds of U.N. member nations have already recognized the state of Palestine.
IN FAVOR OR LEANING THAT WAY:
RUSSIA: Probably yes. It supported Palestinian membership in the U.N. cultural agency, UNESCO. The Russian Foreign Ministry said it ‘‘believes that the Palestinians have the right for such a move.’’ ‘'We hope that the Palestinian leadership has well calculated possible consequences of such action,’’ the Foreign Ministry said.
FRANCE: Yes. Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius made the announcement before parliament. ‘‘In any case, it’s only through negotiations — that we ask for without conditions and immediately between the two sides — that we will be able to reach the realization of a Palestinian state,’’ Fabius said Tuesday.
CHINA: Yes. The foreign minister reaffirmed support for Palestinian aspirations at the U.N. during a meeting last Friday with a Palestinian envoy.
SPAIN, NORWAY, DENMARK and SWITZERLAND: All announced Wednesday they would vote yes. The Swiss government called a change in status ‘‘both constructive and pragmatic.’’
AUSTRIA: Yes. Martin Weiss, the foreign ministry spokesman, said Austria decided to vote for the resolution after it became clear there would be no common EU position.
INDIA: Yes.
OPPOSE, ABSTAIN OR LEANING THAT WAY
UNITED STATES: Opposed.
BRITAIN: Abstain? The foreign secretary said Britain could support the measure only if there were a clear commitment by the Palestinians to return immediately and unconditionally to negotiations with Israel. ‘‘While there is no question of the United Kingdom voting against the resolution, in order to vote for it we would need certain assurances or amendments,’’ said William Hague.
GERMANY: No or abstain? It is ‘‘very certain that Germany will not vote for such a resolution,’’ said Chancellor Angela Merkel’s spokesman, Steffen Seibert.Officials aren’t saying whether that will translate into a no vote or abstention.
NETHERLANDS: Probably no. ‘‘Lasting peace in the region can only be reached if Israel and the Palestinians return to the negotiating table to reach a final agreement over a two-state solution,’’ according to a letter the foreign minister sent to parliament this week.
AUSTRALIA: Abstain, according to Prime Minister Julia Gillard. Her government is divided on the issue, but Gillard told Parliament ‘‘bipartisan policy across the major parties in this parliament to support Israel, to support peace in the Middle East, to support two states in the Middle East.’’
___
Associated Press writers George Jahn in Vienna, Austria; Danica Kirka in London; Jamey Keaten in Paris; Nirmala George in New Delhi; and Christopher Bodeen in Beijing; and Geir Moulson in Berlin contributed.
What is to be done between now and 2SS? | September 17, 2017 |
The settlers will rise in power in Israel's new government | March 14, 2013 |
Israeli Apartheid | March 14, 2013 |
Israel forces launch arrest raids across West Bank | March 14, 2013 |
This Court Case Was My Only Hope | March 14, 2013 |
Netanyahu Prepares to Accept New Coalition | March 14, 2013 |
Obama may scrap visit to Ramallah | March 14, 2013 |
Obama’s Middle East trip: Lessons from Bill Clinton | March 14, 2013 |
Settlers steal IDF tent erected to prevent Palestinian encampment | March 14, 2013 |
Intifada far off | March 14, 2013 |